A LETTER
FROM A
SCHOLAR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD,
TO MADAM
G______
Giving an ACCOUNT of the
BUILDING of an EIGHTEENTH- and NINETEENTH CENTURY GARDEN in the HEART of SHEFFIELD
SHEFFIELD
Composed by
AJ SMITH, under the guidance of Dr J HODSON of Jessop West, Hanover Street, and
the support of the good souls of FURNACE PARK. MMXIV
---oOo---
MADAM,
Since I was favoured with your obliging letter, nothing remarkable has
happened here, other than the invention and implementation of a new experiment,
so preposterous and daring, of which I shall give you an ACCOUNT, as it may
divert you a little. The garden of our own age, it seems, is fundamentally
interdisciplinary, and that’s what our project is interested in thinking about…
The
eighteenth-century has been a period which not only saw the co-existence of
many types of garden, but also significant shifts in conceptualisations of what
a garden was meant to be. Writing in 1712 Joseph Addison picked up on
this in his hugely popular paper, The Spectator, throwing his own
opinion into the mix:
Our British
Gardeners […], instead of humouring Nature, love to deviate from it as much as
possible. Our Trees rise in Cones, Globes and Pyramids. We see the Marks of the
Scissors upon every Plant and Bush… For my own part, I would rather look upon a
Tree in all its Luxuriancy and Diffusion of Boughs and Branches, than when it
is thus cut and trimmed into a Mathematical Figure; and cannot but fancy that
an Orchard in Flower looks infinitely more delightful than all the little
Labyrinths or the most finished Parterre. (The Spectator 414, 25 June 1712).
The debate
over ‘order’ which Addison is here charismatically contributing too largely
characterised the first major transition of the century. When thinking
about eighteenth-century gardens the first to come to mind are probably the
grand aristocratic estates and it is these gardens which have attracted
Addison’s scrutiny. It is in these gardens, largely the product of Britain’s
new role as a powerful empire, that many of the design trends were set. In her
wonderfully accessible and concise survey, The English Landscape and the
Romantic-Era Novel, Marie-Luise Egbert identifies a progression of
two dominant garden ‘types’ throughout the century: ‘emblematic’ and ‘expressive.’
In his
essay, ‘Art and Nature in the English Landscape Garden: Design Theory and
Practice, 1700-1818’ David C. Streatfield’s work on the ‘emblematic’ garden has
argued that for the first half of the eighteenth century gardeners were
primarily inspired by the neo-classical landscape paintings of figures such as
Claude Lorrain, Nicolas Pouissin and Salvator Rosa. These gardens strove to
capture the ideal of rural retirement found in the works of Horace and Virgil.
Crucially, as Egbert stresses, these meticulously ordered gardens were designed
to have a definitive interpretation:
Directed by
the layout of monuments and paths to perceive particular vistas and
arrangements of features, the educated beholder could not but read this
intricate web of elements in predictable way. Put differently, this was a space
laden with emblematic significance which relied on the beholder’s ability to
compare and read the features in the way required and to derive from them a
moral precept. (Egbert, English
Landscape, p. 3)
The early
garden was designed to be decoded. The gardener was a prescriptive author with
a message to convey: you could view a garden and get it wrong.
As the
century progressed the ‘emblematic’ garden was superseded by the new idea of an
‘expressive’ garden, which is largely typified by the work of Lancelot
‘Capability’ Brown. As John Dixon Hunt identifies in his essay ‘Emblem and
Expressionism in the Eighteenth-Century Landscape Garden’, it is now the job of
the gardener to provide inspiration for the viewer to determine their own
meaning. Rather than withholding a specific interpretation the garden could now
reflect the feelings of each individual to behold it. The garden could be
experienced differently depending upon the mood and character of its viewer: its
meaning is constructed by the speculative reflection that it stirs within each
if its visitors.
The idea
that a landscaped space could be a canvas with which to elicit and reflect
individual human emotions is indicative of a much broader change in thinking
which encompassed non-artificial landscapes and literature (although, Egbert
goes as far as to claim that these other changes were derived from changes in
garden design). The latter of these changes is something that this project can
consider. Broadly speaking the poetry of the eighteenth-century begins with the
remnants of the country house poem, politicised in poems such as Alexander
Pope’s Windsor Forest, but concludes with the early days of the Romantic
Movement, in which figures such as Wordsworth, Keats and Shelley look to nature
as a source of sublime speculative reflection. The novel also becomes a
platform to consider the emotional and psychological potential of landscape,
with Ann Radcliffe, Matthew Lewis and latterly Jane Austen explicitly addressing
such themes.
The garden
became central to questions of where meaning should come from, and how an
individual should reflect upon their own state of being.
Just as all
of this plays out in the estate gardens of the elite, this century also saw the
emergence of the private allotment and domestic garden (a trend accounted for
here in Sheffield by N. Flavel in ‘Urban Allotment Gardens in the
Eighteenth-Century: The Case of Sheffield’). In one sense, individual citizens
sought to replicate on a smaller scale the ambitious gardens of the landed
gentry; encountering for themselves the very same questions of what a garden
should and could do. However, the garden was far more than a space of artistic
expression and introspection. It also served a practical function.
As this
project will reveal, the garden provided a space to personally grow medicine
and herbal remedies. This is a century that saw the birth of print culture as
we would recognise it today and this new ability and inclination to create and
disseminate information was met by a large market of readers as interested in
family health and medicine as they were in gardening and property maintenance.
The individual garden is at the centre of the momentous changes to eighteenth
century society that paved the way for modernity, affected as it is by the dawn
of print, a new era of prosperity and citizen self-awareness, and the gradual
popularisation of art, science and medicine.
The
eighteenth-century garden (in all of its forms) effortlessly saw art encounter
science, the citizen meet the state, literature meet nature and the individual
begin to consider and reflect upon itself. Now, in 2014, we’re growing a garden
from the long eighteenth century in the middle of Sheffield.
Staff and students in the School of English will be working hard over the
next year to fashion a garden from their research; re-creating, re-enacting and
re-imagining in equal measure to create a space where all can glean an insight
into the domestic world of writers and readers who lived over two centuries ago.
We will be keeping a record of
our experience on the Furnace Park blog: http://www.furnacepark.org/blog/.
There is
much to be learnt from how the garden came to be all of these things, and
hopefully in recreating such a garden at the impossible plot in Furnace Park we
will unlock the secrets of how this could possibly be and apply them in our own
future research. In rediscovering what this space meant two hundred years ago
we will learn the value of interdisciplinarity today.
As it is
high time to conclude this long letter, I shall only add that you can depend
upon the truth of the whole story, the several facts being consistent with my
own knowledge. Make my compliments to all friends and believe me to be,
Yours
Sincerely,
Adam James
Smith
To learn more, do gad over and visit the following...
The Garden's Blog and Twitter
Furnace Park Blog and Twitter
Arts Enterprise Blog and Twitter
The School of English Blog and Twitter
Joe Moore (far right) at the Garden |
The post © Adam James Smith (@elementaladam) on behalf of the Furnace Park Garden project. The project, which is run by the faculty of Arts and Humanities at the University of Sheffield, is directed by Dr Jane Hodson of the School of English and is supported by Arts Enterprise. The garden is one of many exciting and interdisciplinary projects taking place at Furnace Park.
3 comments:
I just realized that I haven't left you a formal comment. This is very well done! There are several parts here that I will be citing for my thesis on eighteenth century American aristocratic housing.
Fantastic post and information. :D
That's absolutely wonderful to hear. I'm thrilled by how well this post has gone down with readers, the project is such an exciting one!
A very interesting read. A subject I'm going to do my own research on. Thank you.
Post a Comment